Sitting center square at middle-age, I sometimes reflect on how much has changed in my (almost) 46 years on this planet.
Technology changes at a dizzying pace. Laptops, cell-phones, iPhones, Blackberries -- all are expressions of technological change. They also serve as agents of change themselves, connecting us in ways never imagined by our grandparents and even by our parents.
I'm fascinated by the ways the applications for these pieces of technology can alter and enhance our lives. They connect us to people we might never have the opportunity to know. Couples meet, marry and divorce, all from websites. Social networking sites like Facebook and MySpace let us share our lives with the world.
Blogs do the same thing. I have friends, people I don't get to see all the time, who say to me, "I keep up with your life by reading your blog. I like knowing what you're doing and thinking."
Social networking sites and blogs have allowed me to reach out to authors and performers that I just want to say hi to. Not mega-celebrities or even celebrities, but just people doing what they do. Before, you would have to send a letter to an author's publisher and never really know if it was being received. And more likely than not, you probably wouldn't get a response. But here, you can send a note to a Johnny Diaz and say, "Hey, I like what you said." And usually receive some kind words in reply.
When I logged on to Typepad to write this morning, I hadn't meant to talk about technology. My theme was change, inspired by something I saw in the Times.
While it doesn't happen as fast as cell phones evolve, great social change is happening right under our noses. Today we have a woman and a black man fighting for the presidential nomination. History is being made right before us.
What struck me this morning was just a photo and a few paragraphs of text: a wedding announcement in the Sunday Styles section of the paper.
Victor Self and Christopher Fraley had a commitment ceremony last night in St. Bart's. And it was technological and social change that allowed their bright shiny faces to be printed in the New York Times.
Yes, there they were...a black man and a white guy. It wasn't all that long ago that they'd be considered in violation of all natural laws by marrying outside their respective races. I'm sure there are readers of the Times who still can't stand the fact that the paper would even publish a wedding such as this.
They met through an on-line dating service. And they are working with a agency in Los Angeles that arranges surrogate mothers to have babies for same-sex couples.
So let's review: same sex couple, mixed-race couple, an on-line meeting, a public commitment ceremony, a baby in the future. And all of it in the New York Times. (I was even able to yank a picture of the happy couple off the website!)
My grandmother wouldn't know what to make of it. And I wonder what the drag queens at the Stonewall Bar in 1969 think of it. Was this what the early activists of the GLBT movement envisioned? I don't know. What I do know is that I am thrilled and delighted by it.