I interrupt my regularly scheduled "first post of the new year/what I want to accomplish in 2010" piece to talk about something different.
Last evening, willing myself not to think about my first day back at work after two weeks, Andy and I settled in (under comfy blankets given the cold snap in South Florida) to watch season three of The Tudors, newly released on DVD.
If you haven't seen it, The Tudors is a lavishly produced historical fiction series on Showtime about the reign of English monarch Henry VIII (played by Jonathan Rhys Meyers). It's graphic in its presentation of extremes -- brutal murders and rampant sexual goings on.
Driving to work this morning, still rebelling against the idea of work, I thought about the four episodes I viewed last night. The drama draws the viewer in, even when you may not particularly like the people the actors portray.
My mind focused on the hypocrisy of the time. While the writers and producers do take a little liberty with the timing of the events and even the compositions of some of the characters, what I do think they honestly portray is the brutal nature of the church -- both the Roman Catholic church and the newly-formed Church of England. While purporting to be deeply pious, Henry orders beheadings and hangings by the score. Even the pope, in an early episode, asks, "Why doesn't someone kill the whore?", referring to Henry's mistress and eventual wife, Anne Boleyn.
Even their adherence to sexual mores are questionable. With his wife pregnant with his son (finally!), Henry cheats with one of her attendants.
I would like to think that as a society, we have progressed in our moral values. To be sure, many have. Hopefully, the Roman Catholic Church is not still ordering the death of people who dare to disagree. And I don't think Queen Elizabeth has had anyone beheaded lately.
But silly me. Perhaps we haven't come that far.
Take a look at the front page of the New York Times today, right below the fold: "After U.S. Evangelicals Visit, Uganda Considers Death for Gays."
It seems as though three of our country's high and mighty holy rollers -- Scott Lively, (a "missionary);" Caleb Lee Brundidge (a self-described gay man who leads "healing seminars), and Don Schmierer (a board member from Exodus International (oh please)) -- traveled to Uganda to give a series of talks on "the gay agenda -- that whole hidden and dark agenda." Three days they spewed their venom. The visitors, according to the Times, "discussed how to make gay people straight, how gay men often sodomized teenage boys and how 'the gay movement is an evil institution' whose goal is 'to defeat the marriage-based society and replace it with a culture of sexual promiscuity.'"
In the audience were thousands of police officers, teachers, and national politicians.
One month after the conference (one month!) a Ugandan politician, who allegedly has ties to evangelical friends in the American government, introduced a bill that threatens to hang homosexuals.
David Bahati, Ugandan lawmaker
Of course the three are backing away from their involvement in the matter. I love what Schmierer said: "That's horrible, absolutely horrible. Some of the nicest people I have ever met are gay people."
What these three have done, according to the Rev. Kapya Kaoma, a Zambian who went undercover to chronicle the relationship bewteen the African anti-homosexual movement and American evangelicals, "is set the fire they can't quench."
I guess we haven't come as far as I would like. I wonder if some years hence, Showtime will make a series about the truth behind the evangelical movement. If so, they should be portrayed as the immoral thugs they are, just like the church leaders in Henry's day.